![]() ![]() Rajiv Malhotra interviews Swami NithyanandaĢ. Yet, despite these revelations, many people still considers it appropriate to refer to this charlatan as ‘swami’. This reveals Rajasekara to be a conscience-less selfish individual who will betray trust without compunction. Rajasekara exploited that trust and encouraged the misconception of the disciple. The disciple in the video sincerely served this person in the belief that this person is a realized master and that serving such an enlightened person is correct. This person had no qualms in exploiting trust. Rajasekara was disrespectful towards the kAvi, its symbolic meaning and the tradition that values it.ģ. ![]() This person, despite knowing the symbolic value of kAvi as representing sublimation of desires in the fire of spiritual enquiry, wore that while he indulged himself in carnal pleasures, while he enjoyed food, while he engrossed himself in television. That using this charade he hoodwinked thousands of people for many years means that he had developed duplicity as a character trait.Ģ. ![]() That he carried out this charade for many years means that he is a habitual liar. Rajasekara was a liar, in claiming to be brahmachari and realized master. guru-shishya relationship should not have been sullied in this manner.įourth, he did his act wearing the color of renunciation- kAvi.ġ. Second, he was not a ‘realized master’, who overcame carnal desires. One, Rajasekara was not a brahmachari as he claimed. The crux of the matter is that Rajasekara claimed to be a brahmachari, that too, a ‘realized master’. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |